Turkish Islamist Welfare Party
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65074/f406mf89Keywords:
Turkey, Welfare Party, Political PartyAbstract
The contemporary Turkish secularism did not completely forget its society’s Islamic roots. Despite the attempts by Atatürk and his followers to erase Turkey’s Islamic identity, these efforts failed. New movements quickly emerged demanding adherence to Islam. This is where the importance of this study lies, as the Welfare Party, the focus of our research, did not rise to power without the arduous struggle faced by Islamic parties against secular political forces since the 1970s.
The reason I chose this topic is my curiosity and desire to learn more about the details of the greatest Islamic party in contemporary Turkey, the Welfare Party: how it reached power, what its political goals were, and whether it fulfilled the ambitions of its supporters. The researcher attempted to address these and other questions in the drafts of this study.
The research includes an introduction, a preamble, four chapters, and a conclusion. The preamble provides a general overview of the contemporary Islamic movement in Turkey and its early party foundations. The Islamic influence was reduced by Atatürk, to the extent that the law confirming Turkey as an Islamic state was repealed. Despite this, Islamic activity continued in secret. After World War II, Turkey entered the multi-party phase, which increased Islamic political activity. Following the 1971 coup, the stage was set for Islamic parties to form, such as the National Order Party and later the National Salvation Party, which ultimately led to the establishment of the Welfare Party (the subject of this research.
The first chapter studies the political program of the Welfare Party, which it used in its electoral battles with other parties. Among the key points of this program was the economic system, known as the “just system,” which followed a middle path between communism and capitalism. The second chapter discusses the Welfare Party’s rise to power and its role therein. The circumstances in Turkey at that time helped the party ascend to power in 1996, after it secured a high percentage of votes and formed an alliance with the Virtue Party. However, the party was later accused of conspiring against the secular system, which led to its dissolution.
The third chapter examines the outcomes of the party’s governance. Among the most notable were the increase in public employees’ salaries and attempts to improve Turkey’s economic situation. The party also offered partial solutions to the Kurdish issue through cooperation with neighboring countries, and succeeded in addressing problems in Turkish prisons, alleviating the injustice faced by prisoners. The final chapter explores criticisms directed at the party, including its contradictory positions before and after coming to power. For example, the party changed its stance toward Israel and the European Union, becoming closer to them, while paradoxically suppressing the military faction that adopted Islamic ideology.
References
أحمد الموصللي، موسوعة الحركات الإسلامية في الوطن العربي وإيران وتركيا، مركز دراسات الوحدة العربية، ط1، بيروت، 2004.
٭ أنور الجندي، يقَظَة الإسلام في تركيا، دار الأنصار، القاهرة، د.ت.
٭ رضا هلال، السيف والهلال تركيا من أتاتورك الى أربكان الصراع بين المؤسسة العسكرية والإسلام السياسي، ط1، دار الشروق، القاهرة، 1999.
٭ عبد العزيز محمد عوض الله، الحياة الحزبية في تركيا الحديثة، سلسلة الدراسات الدينية والتاريخية العدد 24، مركز الدراسات الشرقية جامعة القاهرة، المطبعة العمرانية، الجيزة، 2002.
٭ كريم محمد حمزه، و دهام محمود علي الجبوري، القوى الفاعلة في المجتمع التركي، ط1، بيت الحكمة، بغداد، 2002.
٭ محمد طه الجاسر، تركية ميدان الصراع الشرق والغرب، دمشق، 2002.
٭ محمد عزة دروزة، تركيا في العهد الجمهوري، بيروت، 1951.
٭ محمد نور الدين، تركيا في الزمن المتحول قلق الهوية وصراع الخيارات، ط1، رياض الريس للطباعة والنشر، بيروت، 1997.
٭ _________، قبعة وعمامة مدخل الى الحركات الإسلامية في تركيا، ط1، دار النهار للنشر، بيروت، 1997.
٭ __________، تركيا الجمهورية الحائرة مقاربات في الدين والسياسة والعلاقات الخارجية، مركز الدراسات الاستراتيجية والبحوث والتوثيق، ط1، بيروت، 1998.
٭ محمود شاكر، التاريخ المعاصر تركيا، سلسلة التاريخ الإسلامي (17)، ط2، المكتب الإسلامي، بيروت، 1994.
٭ مرغريت حلو، الإسلام والسياسة في تركيا ماضياً وحاضراً ومستقبلاً، مركز الدراسات الأرمينية، بيروت، 1995.
٭ مصطفى كمال، تركيا في العهد الجمهوري ترجمة: دار بيروت للترجمة، بيروت، 1951، ج1.
٭ يوسف إبراهيم الجهماني ، حزب الرفاه الرهان على السلطة، ط1، دار حوران للطباعة والنشر والتوزيع، دمشق، 1997.
٭ يوسف القرضاوي، التطرف العلماني في مواجهة الإسلام (نموذج تركيا وتونس)، ط3، دار الشروق، القاهرة، 2008.
ثانياً: الأطاريح الجامعية
٭ نوال عبد الجبار سلطان طاهر الطائي، التطورات السياسية الداخلية في تركيا (1960-1980)، أطروحة دكتوراه غير منشورة مقدمة الى كلية التربية جامعة الموصل عام 2002.
ثالثاً: البحوث والدراسات
٭ عبد الله تركماني، الإسلام والحداثة السياسية في التجربة التركية، الإسلاميون والحكم في البلاد العربية وتركيا، مراكش، 2006.
٭ محمد خيري قيرباش اغلوا، الحركة الإصلاحية السياسية التركية في الميزان، الإسلاميون والحكم في البلاد العربية وتركيا، مراكش، 2006.
٭ محمد العادل، قراءة في أبرز النجاحات والإخفاقات في المسيرة السياسية للحركة الإسلامية في تركيا، الإسلاميون والحكم في البلاد العربية وتركيا، مراكش، 2006.
رابعاً: الأنترنيت
٭ الموسوعة الحرة
ar. Wikipedia.org
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing:
For all articles published in Journal of Studies in History and Archeology, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers: It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
Permission is required for: Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
Permission is not required for: Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either "Data from..." or "Adapted from...".
Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.
Obtaining Permission
In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Al-Adab Journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: "Reproduced with permission from [author], [book/journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.











