أثر التوجيهات الشفاهية للحاكم بأمر الله الفاطمي

Abstract

Head of the Diwan regarding state affairs. These directives serve as a quick diagnosis of the Caliph's shortcomings, prompting him to take immediate action. These distinctive directives are considered signatures, but they are not merely signatures; they are sent to the Caliph via mail for him to respond to, express his opinion on, or issue his judgment on them. This might involve redressing an injustice done to someone wronged by a decree or removing a governor who has mistreated the people. The signature indicates that the mail was read on one side and a written response on the other. In contrast, oral evidence represents a visible situation to the Caliph, prompting him to rectify it early. This is what we aim to illustrate through the tangible observations that unfolded before the eyes of the Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah (d. 411 AH). His reaction to these observations was not merely a reaction to them. These indicators have proven instrumental in resolving many social issues and matters. They have been recorded with convincing judgments and decisive rulings, often requiring the issuance of orders. Note that these directives may sometimes lead to the issuance of an order. By issuing a record of it, but we define it and know that these directives came from the ruling film and after that his order was carried out directly.